csirt@kutim:~/threat-intel/cve/CVE-2026-90042

Katalog CVE

CVSS 9.8 · Critical EPSS 0,50%

Skor CVSS 3.1 9.8 (Critical) menurut CNA.

Deskripsi (NVD)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: properly decrypt filenames in vmalloc() buffers The fscrypt subsystem uses the scatterlist crypto API, inheriting its requirement that any buffers are in the linear mapping region. However, the messenger client uses kvmalloc() to create buffers for messages, which will occasionally place those buffers in the vmalloc() region when physical memory fragmentation doesn't permit a large enough kmalloc(). The various callers of ceph_fname_to_usr() directly pass (slices of) raw messages from the MDS without considering that the messages may be in vmalloc() buffers, resulting in oopses especially on non-x86 platforms (see 'Closes:' for more details and a reproducer). Make ceph_fname_to_usr() explicitly tolerant of vmalloc()-allocated fname->ctext, fname->name, and/or oname->name buffers, using `tname` (which, when non-null, must be a linear address; when null, is briefly allocated as necessary) as a bounce buffer to avoid passing any inappropriate addresses to fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(). Additionally change parse_reply_info_readdir() -- the only function to supply its own `tname` -- to follow the new "tname must never come from vmalloc()" rule by passing NULL when the message is not in the linear region. Though this causes a per-dentry kmalloc()+kfree(), this overhead exists only when processing the minority of messages that spill into vmalloc(). My (crude) testing puts this at only about 1 in 8,000 readdir messages. Still, if the overhead proves unreasonable in the future, it is easy enough to mitigate: a future change could allocate a bounce buffer in parse_reply_info_readdir() and use that as `tname` instead.

Rincian

Terbit di NVD
16 September 2026
Terakhir diubah
21 September 2026
Status NVD
Received
CVSS 3.1
9.8 (Critical), sumber CNA
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H · uraikan di kalkulator
EPSS (30 hari)
0,50% peluang dieksploitasi; lebih tinggi dari 41,3% CVE lain

Produk dan versi terdampak

NVD belum mencantumkan data produk (CPE) untuk CVE ini. Produk yang terdampak biasanya disebut di deskripsi dan di advisory vendor pada daftar referensi.

Referensi dan perbaikan

Sumber: NVD · CVE.org · EPSS. Halaman ini disusun otomatis dari data tersebut; pembaruan terakhir 5 Okt 2026, 20:11 WITA. Kalau sistem di Perangkat Daerah memakai produk ini dan butuh bantuan, laporkan lewat kanal pelaporan.