csirt@kutim:~/threat-intel/cve/CVE-2026-89646

Katalog CVE

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0,17%

Skor CVSS 3.1 7.8 (High) menurut CNA.

Deskripsi (NVD)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: fix leaked inode reference on writeback abort at umount ceph_dirty_folio() takes a wrbuffer claim on each newly dirtied folio: it bumps i_wrbuffer_ref (taking an ihold() on the 0->1 transition) and attaches the snap_context to folio->private. That claim is released only by ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(), which for a submitted write runs from writepages_finish(). In ceph_submit_write(), if ceph_inc_osd_stopping_blocker() fails -- which happens during umount -- the request is aborted before submission: the already-collected folios are only redirtied and unlocked, so writepages_finish() never runs and the claim is leaked. redirty_page_for_writepage() -> folio_redirty_for_writepage() -> filemap_dirty_folio() sets PG_dirty directly and does not go through ->dirty_folio, so ceph_dirty_folio() is not re-entered to rebalance it. Because every subsequent writeback also fails the osd_stopping_blocker, i_wrbuffer_ref never returns to 0, the ihold() is never dropped, and the inode cannot be evicted: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of ceph kernel BUG at fs/super.c:650! Release the orphaned claim in the abort path before redirtying, via ceph_undo_wrbuffer_claim(): detach the snap_context, drop the wrbuffer reference (letting i_wrbuffer_ref reach 0 and iput() the inode), and drop the snap_context reference -- i.e. do what writepages_finish() would have done for these never-submitted folios. Only the locked_pages entries are undone; folios still in the fbatch were never dirty-cleared by this call (folio_clear_dirty_for_io() is the ownership-transfer point, and a successful move NULLs the fbatch slot), so they hold no claim this call owns.

Rincian

Terbit di NVD
11 September 2026
Terakhir diubah
13 September 2026
Status NVD
Received
CVSS 3.1
7.8 (High), sumber CNA
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H · uraikan di kalkulator
EPSS (30 hari)
0,17% peluang dieksploitasi; lebih tinggi dari 6,2% CVE lain

Produk dan versi terdampak

NVD belum mencantumkan data produk (CPE) untuk CVE ini. Produk yang terdampak biasanya disebut di deskripsi dan di advisory vendor pada daftar referensi.

Referensi dan perbaikan

Sumber: NVD · CVE.org · EPSS. Halaman ini disusun otomatis dari data tersebut; pembaruan terakhir 5 Okt 2026, 20:11 WITA. Kalau sistem di Perangkat Daerah memakai produk ini dan butuh bantuan, laporkan lewat kanal pelaporan.