csirt@kutim:~/threat-intel/cve/CVE-2026-74674

Katalog CVE

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0,17%

Skor CVSS 3.1 7.8 (High) menurut CNA.

Deskripsi (NVD)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: fix incorrect flush address in direct page table reclaim When zap_pte_range reclaims a page table, it does: pte_free_tlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr); and this is unconditionally wrong: if this code executes, addr *always* points one past the end of the range covered by the table. The addr parameter is used to flush the TLB (really the paging-structure-cache) to drop references to the to-be-freed table, and any architecture that cares about the parameter will flush the wrong address. (But they'll still free the correct page). I think it's worth contemplating why the kernel works at all. If we hit the offending line of code, we will first clear the PMD entry (line 1954, zap_empty_pte_table), then we will issue pending flushes if force_flush is set (tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb)), then we will skip the retry on line 1979 (phew!), and then we will do the offending pte_free_tlb call. *Or* we will clear the PMD entry immediately before pte_free_tlb (line 1983, zap_pte_table_if_empty). If we have any pending flushes (i.e. we actually zapped any last-level entries) at the time we clear the PMD entry, then the flush really ought to flush all references to the table (Linus certainly seems to think it will on all architectures [0]). The condition under which we have no accumulated flushes at the time of the clear is very complex (the whole zap_pte_range function has absurdly complex control flow). If we do hit the bad case, then we will end up clearing the PMD entry after the last time the range is flushed, and any CPU is free to cache a reference to the (empty) page table. If this happens due to an ordinary read or write, it would segfault, so it would be rare. But the cache could be speculatively filled as well. Then we'll flush the wrong address and then free and possibly reuse the table. On x86, even flushing the wrong address works on non-KPTI Intel systems because INVLPG flushes *all* paging-structure-caches, not just the ones for the target address. But INVPCID does not, and flush_tlb_one_user will use INVPCID if it's available. And then we're toast. AMD systems are more susceptible: we set the EFER.TCE bit, which makes even INVLPG only flush the target address. I think this might fix an issue in ripgrep reported here: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/issues/3494 [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFzBggoXtNXQeng5d_mRoDnaMBE5Y+URs+PHR67nUpMtaw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

Rincian

Terbit di NVD
22 Agustus 2026
Terakhir diubah
25 Agustus 2026
Status NVD
Received
CVSS 3.1
7.8 (High), sumber CNA
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H · uraikan di kalkulator
EPSS (30 hari)
0,17% peluang dieksploitasi; lebih tinggi dari 5,3% CVE lain

Produk dan versi terdampak

NVD belum mencantumkan data produk (CPE) untuk CVE ini. Produk yang terdampak biasanya disebut di deskripsi dan di advisory vendor pada daftar referensi.

Referensi dan perbaikan

Sumber: NVD · CVE.org · EPSS. Halaman ini disusun otomatis dari data tersebut; pembaruan terakhir 5 Okt 2026, 20:11 WITA. Kalau sistem di Perangkat Daerah memakai produk ini dan butuh bantuan, laporkan lewat kanal pelaporan.