csirt@kutim:~/threat-intel/cve/CVE-2022-49783

Katalog CVE

CVSS 5.5 · Medium EPSS 0,17%

Kerentanan pada linux kernel. Skor CVSS 3.1 5.5 (Medium) menurut NVD.

Deskripsi (NVD)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 Preemption disabled at: fpu_clone CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G E (unreleased) Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl ? fpu_clone __might_resched rt_spin_lock fpu_clone ? copy_thread ? copy_process ? shmem_alloc_inode ? kmem_cache_alloc ? kernel_clone ? __do_sys_clone ? do_syscall_64 ? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe </TASK> Mike says: The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(), and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic() returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never been enabled. Mike's assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables preemption so calling spin_lock_irq() in fpu_inherit_perms() is unsafe. This problem exists since commit 9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features"). Even though the original bug report should not have enabled the paths at all, the bug still exists. fpregs_lock is necessary when editing the FPU registers or a task's FP state but it is not necessary for fpu_inherit_perms(). The only write of any FP state in fpu_inherit_perms() is for the new child which is not running yet and cannot context switch or be borrowed by a kernel thread yet. Hence, fpregs_lock is not protecting anything in the new child until clone() completes and can be dropped earlier. The siglock still needs to be acquired by fpu_inherit_perms() as the read of the parent's permissions has to be serialised. [ bp: Cleanup splat. ]

Rincian

Terbit di NVD
1 Mei 2025
Terakhir diubah
17 Juni 2026
Status NVD
Analyzed
CVSS 3.1
5.5 (Medium), sumber NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H · uraikan di kalkulator
EPSS (30 hari)
0,17% peluang dieksploitasi; lebih tinggi dari 5,9% CVE lain

Produk dan versi terdampak

VendorProdukVersi terdampak
linux linux kernel Versi 5.16 hingga sebelum 6.0.10
linux linux kernel Versi 6.1 rc1
linux linux kernel Versi 6.1 rc2
linux linux kernel Versi 6.1 rc3
linux linux kernel Versi 6.1 rc4
linux linux kernel Versi 6.1 rc5

> Data dari konfigurasi CPE di NVD.

Referensi dan perbaikan

Sumber: NVD · CVE.org · EPSS. Halaman ini disusun otomatis dari data tersebut; pembaruan terakhir 5 Okt 2026, 20:10 WITA. Kalau sistem di Perangkat Daerah memakai produk ini dan butuh bantuan, laporkan lewat kanal pelaporan.